Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. J. R. Simplot Company

Good Law
418 F.2d 793·1969 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,975·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10320
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 196922829California10,623 words

Opinion

Opinion

418 F.2d 793 TEXAS GULF SULPHUR COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant and Appellant, v. J. R. SIMPLOT COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee, and John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, a corporation, Intervener and Appellee. No. 22829. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. October 24, 1969. John D. Hartigan (argued), New York City, Elam, Burke, Jeppesen & Evans, Boise, Idaho, for appellant. Jess B. Hawley, Jr. (argued), Paul B. Ennis, of Hawley, Troxell, Ennis & Hawley, Boise, Idaho, Carl J. Schuck (argued), of Overton, Lyman & Prince, Los Angeles, Cal., Eberle & Berlin, Boise, Idaho, for appellee. Before HAMLIN, BROWNING and CARTER, Circuit Judges. JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge: 1 This action was started by J. R. Simplot Company, a corporation (hereafter Simplot), to obtain a judgment that Texas Gulf Sulphur Company, a corporation (hereafter Texas Gulf), was obligated under an option clause in a 1963 contract to deliver each year to Simplot 40,000 long tons of sulphur. Texas Gulf's answer denied Simplot's interpretation of the option clause and by affirmative defense claimed a different price was involved or alternately that no price was provided…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.