United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Albert James Tweedy, Jr., Defendant-Petitioner

Good Law
419 F.2d 192·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9794
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 196923041_1California928 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duniway, J.

In 1964, Tweedy pled guilty to a charge of bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) and (d). He was sentenced to imprisonment for 15 years. In 1967, he filed a motion to set aside his conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . The motion was denied without a hearing, and he appeals.

1. Was a hearing required?

Tweedy asserts that his plea was induced by the promise of an F.B.I. agent that, if he pled guilty, he would be sentenced to a term of not more than five years. He also says that nobody advised him of the allowable range of punishment, up to 25 years imprisonment.

Normally, an evidentiary hearing must be held where a § 2255 motion raises factual allegations, unless the “files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ; Machibroda v. United States, 1962, 368 U.S. 487 -495, 82 S.Ct. 510 , 7 L.Ed.2d 473 . See also, Walker v. Johnston, 1941, 312 U.S. 275 , 61 S.C.t. 574, 85 L.Ed. 830 ; Wells v. Craven, 9 Cir., 1968, 404 F.2d 745 ; Coleman v. Wilson, 9 Cir., 1968, 401 F.2d 536 ; Castro v. United States, 9 Cir., 1968, 396 F.2d 345, 348 ; Bright v. Rhay, 9 Cir., 1968, 391 F.2d 915 ; Jones v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 384 F.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.