Raymond Meadows v. United States

Good Law
420 F.2d 795·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9579
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 196924756California2,065 words

Opinion

Opinion

420 F.2d 795 Raymond MEADOWS, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 24756. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. December 23, 1969. James F. Hewitt (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Jerrold Lader (argued), David H. Fox, Asst. U. S. Attys., Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Before MERRILL and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and BEEKS, * District Judge. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge. 1 The question before us is whether the Supreme Court's decision in Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85 , 88 S.Ct. 722 , 19 L.Ed.2d 923 (1968) is to be applied retroactively. We hold that it is. 2 In Haynes , decided January 20, 1968, the Court held that a plea of the privilege against self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment was a complete defense to a prosecution under 26 U.S.C. § 5851 for possession of a firearm not registered pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 5841 . Appellant Raymond Meadows was indicted December 15, 1965, in the Northern District of California for violation of the identical statutory provisions involved in Haynes . He pleaded guilty on January 20, 1966, and was sentenced…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.