Hays v. United Fireworks Mfg. Co.

Good Law
420 F.2d 836·13 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 67·1970 Trade Cas. (CCH) 73,006·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9781
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 196922690_1California4,961 words

Opinion

Opinion

420 F.2d 836 P. D. HAYS and Ruth Hays, his wife, d/b/a Hays Fireworks Co., Appellees, v. UNITED FIREWORKS MFG. CO., Clipper Pyrotechnic Corporation, Zebra Distributing Company, W. Patrick Moriarty, Jack Martin and Elizabeth Moriarty, Appellants. No. 22690. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. December 9, 1969. Noble K. Gregory, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., Dore, Dubuar & Cummins, Paul C. Gibbs, Seattle, Wash., for appellants. Charles Lonergan, Seattle, Wash. (argued), of Corbett, Siderius & Lonergan, Seattle, Wash., for appellees. Before HAMLEY, BROWNING and ELY, Circuit Judges. HAMLEY, Circuit Judge: 1 This is a civil antitrust action for treble damages involving the fireworks business in the State of Washington. The plaintiffs are P. D. Hays and Ruth Hays, his wife. They own and operate Hays Fireworks Company, a sole proprietorship engaged in the wholesale and retail fireworks business in Olympia, Thurston County, Washington. 2 The defendants are three other fireworks companies and three individuals: United Fireworks Mfg. Co. (United), an Ohio corporation engaged in the manufacture of fireworks; Clipper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.