Tony Chisum, Jr. v. United States

Good Law
421 F.2d 207·1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 11216
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 197022978California2,104 words

Opinion

Opinion

Koelsch, J.

Tony Chisum, Jr. appeals from his conviction on all ten counts of an indictment charging him with violations of the narcotics and tax laws. ( 21 U.S.C. § 174 and 26 U.S.C. §§ 4705 (a)).

His principal contentions are that he was denied a speedy trial guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution and a fair trial afforded by the due process clause of the Fifth.

The charges were rested upon a series of four separate transactions in each of which Chisum supplied heroin to an undercover narcotics agent. The first transaction took place on May 11, and the last on May 26, 1966. Chisum was indicted on January 11, 1967 and tried the following September.

We reject Chisum’s Sixth Amendment contention. The burden was upon Chisum not only to assert the right in the trial court but to offer at least a plausible claim of prejudice or oppression by virtue of the delay. United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 (1966). He did, on two occasions prior to trial, move to dismiss the action. However, in support of these motions, he did not assert or suggest that the defense might be impaired because of a dimming of his memory or an inability to secure witnesses or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.