Uribe-Temblador v. Rosenberg

Good Law
423 F.2d 717·1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10869
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 197024407California359 words

Opinion

Opinion

423 F.2d 717 Alberto URIBE-TEMBLADOR, Appellant-Petitioner, v. George K. ROSENBERG, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service of the United States Department of Justice, Appellee-Respondent. No. 24407. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 5, 1970. A. D. Cohen (argued), Hiram W. Kwan, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant-petitioner. James Stotter (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Wm. Matthew Byrne, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., Immigration and Naturalization Service, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Sureck, Regional Counsel, I.N.S., San Pedro, Cal., John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen. of United States, Washington, D. C., for appellee-respondent. Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON, * District Judge. PER CURIAM. 1 The deportation decision brought here for review is affirmed. In our review of the record, we find no error. 2 Petitioner was born in Mexico. His mother was an American citizen who left this country for Mexico when she was five years old. His father was a citizen of Mexico. Intermittently the mother was in and out of the United States. Petitioner's road to citizenship would be open if the mother had had five out…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.