Summit Media, LLC v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
192 Cal. Rptr. 3d 662·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 783·240 Cal. App. 4th 171
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 2015B255050California8,725 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grimes, J.

SUMMARY

This is the second appeal in a dispute among several outdoor advertising companies and the City of Los Angeles over certain billboards with digital displays. In the first appeal, we affirmed the trial court’s finding that a settlement agreement between two of the companies and the city, allowing the companies to digitize many of their existing billboards, was illegal and void, because a municipal ordinance expressly prohibited “ ‘alterations or enlargements’ ” of such signs. (Summit Media LLC v. City of Los Angeles (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 921, 924 [ 150 Cal.Rptr.3d 574 ] (Summit Media I).) We also concluded, contrary to the trial court’s judgment, that it was necessary to revoke all digital conversion permits granted under the illegal settlement agreement. (Ibid.) We directed the trial court “to amend its order so that it invalidates all digital conversion permits issued by the city to real parties under the settlement agreement.” (Id. at pp. 941-942.)

The trial court, after hearings, promptly amended its order, declaring the digital conversion permits invalid. The trial court’s order also identified the signs at issue, and ordered the immediate discontinuation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.