Francisco Alvaro-Iraeta v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
616 F. App'x 264
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 201512-71287California254 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

The 90-day stay of proceedings in this case expired on July 7, 2015. Thus, respondent’s motion to lift the stay is denied as moot.

Francisco Alvaro-Iraeta, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board- of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, including adverse credibility findings. Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on the inconsistencies between Alvaro-Iraeta’s asylum application and his testimony regarding events in El Salvador and his reason for fleeing. See Ceballos-Castillo v. INS, 904 F.2d 519, 520 (9th Cir.1990); Zamanov v. Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir.2011). We reject Alvaro-Iraeta’s contention that the IJ failed to properly consider his explanations for the inconsistencies. See Zamanov, 649 F.3d at 974 . In the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.