Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Honorable Stanley A. Weigel, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California

Good Law
426 F.2d 1356·1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9066
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 197025456California362 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus or prohibition nullifying respondent’s order transferring a civil action to the District Court for the District of Maine under 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a). Petitioner has made a forceful presentation in this court in support of two contentions not advanced in the district court.

The first is that because the action was filed in a Superior Court of the State of California, and removed to the court below on the ground of diversity, the criteria to be applied in considering the motion for transfer should be those which would have been applied by the state court in considering a motion to dismiss under the doctrine of forum non conveniens.

The rule generally applied on appeal is that an assertion of error below will not be entertained where the issue was not raised in the lower court and the error, assuming it occurred, might have been avoided if the issue had been raised. The importance of the rule to the practical administration of the judicial system is obvious, and we adhere to it here.

For essentially the same reason we decline to issue the writ on the ground that the trial judge failed to state the precise grounds for his ruling in a written or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.