Amaya
People v. Amaya
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 2015E060218MCalifornia4,319 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 9/9/15 Unmodified opinion attached
CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E060218
v. (Super.Ct.No. FSB059205)
ALBERT AMAYA, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
Defendant and Appellant. [CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed in this matter on August 11, 2015 is
modified as follows:
1. On page 1, at the end of the first paragraph, replace “Affirmed” with:
Affirmed with directions.
2. On page 2, replace the last paragraph with:
Defendant — understandably — appeals, claiming that
the trial court had no authority to vacate the reduced
sentence. The People respond that the trial court had such
1 authority because the reduced sentence was both unauthorized
and void. We cannot say that the reduced sentence was
unauthorized, because all of the evidence that was before the
trial court at the time indicated that defendant was entitled to
resentencing. However, the reduced sentence…