In re Marriage of LaMoure CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 2015E058817California6,433 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

This is Nathan La Moure’s third appeal in this marital dissolution action. Nathan

appeals the family court’s order entered on January 9, 2013, ordering the sale of Nathan’s

residence located at 30 Sea Island Drive, in Newport Beach (the Sea Island property), in

satisfaction of a civil judgment entered against Nathan.

Nathan contends the lower court did not have jurisdiction to order the sale of the

Sea Island property. The family court found the property was community property

owned by Nathan and his ex-wife, Robin La Moure. Nathan argues the order for sale of

the property by judgment creditor and respondent, Mesa West, Inc. (Mesa West), was

premature because there was no final judgment dividing the marital debts and assets. In

addition, the January 9, 2013 family court order was based on a judgment entered by a

separate court, the Orange County Superior Court, in a civil action.

Nathan also contends the lower court failed to follow California homestead

statutes, Code of Civil Procedure sections 704.710-704.850, and 704.910-704.990, when

ordering the sale of the Sea Island property, which is subject to a homestead exemption.

Nathan further argues Robin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.