Gerard P. Schneider v. The People of the State of California

Good Law
427 F.2d 1178
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 197023876California258 words

Opinion

Opinion

Appellant Schneider petitioned the District Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1443 , for removal to that court of a criminal prosecution pending against him in the Municipal Court for the County of Los Angeles, California. The District Court remanded the action to the state court because of appellant’s apparent failure to comply with a District Court order that he file proof that he had served a copy of his petition for removal on the State of California. Schneider now appeals from the order remanding his action.

Upon examination of the record, we conclude that appellant fully complied with the District Court’s order, and that the District Court had jurisdiction of the matter.

Proceeding to the merits of the petition, we determine that appellant is not entitled to relief. He alleges that the California state statute under which he has been prosecuted violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by permitting “different punishments for the same acts, committed under the same circumstances, by persons in like situation.” Nothing in the Constitution requires that persons convicted of the same crime receive identical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.