Spangler v. Pasadena City Board Of Education

Good Law
427 F.2d 1352
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 197025611California1,863 words

Opinion

Opinion

427 F.2d 1352 Nancy Anne SPANGLER et al., Appellees-Plaintiffs, and United States of America, Appellee-Plaintiff in Intervention, v. PASADENA CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Appellees-Defendants, StanleyAlexander et al., Appellants-Applicants in Intervention. No. 25611. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 15, 1970, As Amended June 25, 1970. Lee G. Paul (argued), of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Brian K. Landsberg (argued), Bernard H. Shapiro, Jerris Leonard, Asst. Atty. Gen., David L. Norman, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., James Stotter, II, Asst. U.S. Atty., Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. John P. Pollock (argued), of Pollock, Palmer & Metzler, Los Angeles, Cal., for Pasadena City Board of Education and others. Albert C. Lum, Of Boyko & Simmons, Los Angeles, Cal., for Nancy Spangler. Before HAMLEY, MERRILL and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. 1 This appeal is taken by appellants Alexander, et al., from an order of the District Court denying them leave to intervene in a suit brought by Spangler, et al., against the Pasadena Board of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.