New England Fish Company, and v. The Barge or Vessel Sonya, Etc.

Good Law
429 F.2d 428·1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7497
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 197024787_1California220 words

Opinion

Opinion

429 F.2d 428 NEW ENGLAND FISH COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. The BARGE OR VESSEL SONYA, etc., et al., Appellant. No. 24787. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. September 1, 1970. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; Raymond E. Plummer, Judge. 1 Robert V. Zener (argued), Alan S. Rosenthal, Stephen R. Felson, Attys., Wm. D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., John F. Meadows, Atty., Admiralty & Shipping Section, U. S. Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, Cal., Douglas B. Baily, U. S. Atty., Anchorage, Alaska, for appellant. 2 W. C. Arnold (argued), Anchorage, Alaska, for appellees. 3 Joseph H. Shortell, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendant Marine View Fisheries, Inc. 4 Burr, Pease & Kurtz, Anchorage, Alaska, for intervenor Nakat Packing Corp. 5 Roy H. Madsen, Kodiak, Alaska, for intervenor Kodiak Oil Sales, Inc. 6 Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 7 The award of the district court of attorney fees from the proceeds of sale of the Vessel Sonya is affirmed. We find it was not clearly erroneous. 8 The likelihood of another factual situation occurring just…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.