Haslerig
Haslerig v. Dyson CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Aaron, J.
I.
INTRODUCTION
Appellants Farris Haslerig, Tammy Haslerig, Stephanie Haslerig, Kyanna
Haslerig, and Kaileigh Haslerig (jointly, appellants) appeal from a judgment in favor of
defendant Phillip H. Dyson entered after a jury trial. Appellants raise three challenges to
the judgment. We conclude that appellants have forfeited two of their appellate
contentions because they have failed to present a sufficient appellate record to enable this
court to review the challenged rulings. We further conclude that appellants have failed to
present a cogent appellate argument with respect to the third challenge raised. We
therefore affirm the judgment.
II.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellants are descendants of George Haslerig, who won several million dollars in
the California State Lottery in 1991. Prior to his death in 2003, George established a
complex set of trusts and a limited partnership for the benefit of his family. Appellants
were intended beneficiaries of these various entities under George's estate plan. Upon
George's death, however, his sole surviving son, Garland, remained as the sole trustee of
the various trusts and the sole general partner of…