Harold I. Richardson v. A. T. Van Dolah

Good Law
429 F.2d 912·1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8063
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 197024048_1California4,661 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ely, J.

This appeal arises from a judgment rescinding two written agreements, a conditional sale contract and a mining sublease, between appellant Van Dolah and appellee Richardson.

The conditional sale agreement provides for the sale of certain real and personal property situated in the Palmer Recording District of the State of Alaska. The real property consists of unpatented placer mining claims, and the personal property consists of undescribed mining equipment located on the claims. Upon the execution of the agreement, appellee was to pay $40,000 cash and tender a $10,000 promissory note payable fifteen days from the date of the agreement. One-half of this $50,000 was to be applied toward the $150,000 price of the real property and one-half toward the $150,000 price of the personal property. The remaining $125,000 owed for the real property was to be paid in monthly installments of $1,500 plus 5% interest during the next nine years. An identical schedule was established for the payment of the remaining $125,000 owed for the personal property.

Upon payment of the initial $50,000, appellee was to acquire possession of the real and personal property and the right to all ores mined and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.