Nettles

People v. Nettles

Good Law
192 Cal. Rptr. 3d 698·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 799·240 Cal. App. 4th 402·15 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 2015C073336California2,564 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Defendant Garyon Tracy Nettles, an inmate serving an indeterminate life sentence imposed pursuant to the three strikes law (Pen. Code, §§ 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), 667, subds. (b)-(i)), appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition to recall his sentence and for resentencing under section 1170.126, which became effective November 7, 2012, after the voters approved Proposition 36, the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (§§ 667, 1170.12, 1170.126; Prop. 36, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 6, 2012); Proposition 36 or the Act).

Section 1170.126 “created a postconviction release proceeding whereby a prisoner who is serving an indeterminate life sentence imposed pursuant to the three strikes law for a crime that is not a serious or violent felony and who is not disqualified, may have his or her sentence recalled and be sentenced as a second strike offender unless the court determines that resentencing would pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety.” (People v. Yearwood (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 161, 168 [ 151 Cal.Rptr.3d 901 ] italics added (Yearwood).) The trial court concluded defendant was disqualified because two of his prior strike convictions were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.