People v. Bell CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 2015B262613California256 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

DISCUSSION

After review of the record, appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed an opening brief which raised no issues and which asked this court to conduct an independent review of the record, under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441. By letter dated June 19, 2015, we advised appellant that he had 30 days to submit by brief or letter any contentions or argument he wished this court to consider. Appellant has not filed a brief or letter. Proposition 47 reduces certain drug and theft offenses to misdemeanors, unless committed by ineligible defendants. (People v. Lynall (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 1102, 1108.) Proposition 47 thus provides, in part: “(a) A person currently serving a sentence for a conviction . . . of a felony . . . who would have been guilty of a misdemeanor under the act . . . had this act been in effect at the time of the offense may petition for a recall of sentence . . . to request resentencing in accordance with Sections 11350, 11357, or 11377 of the Health and Safety Code, or Section 459.5, 473, 476a, 490.2, 496, or 666 of the Penal Code, as those sections have been amended or added by this act.” (§ 1170.18, subd. (a).) None of those sections apply to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.