United States v. John Roselli, United States of America v. Maurice Friedman, United States of America v. Benjamin Teitelbaum, United States of America v. Manuel Jacobs

Good Law
432 F.2d 879
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 30, 197024300_1California14,887 words

Opinion

Opinion

432 F.2d 879 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John ROSELLI, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice FRIEDMAN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin TEITELBAUM, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel JACOBS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 24220. No. 24289. No. 24290. No. 24300. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. September 28, 1970. Rehearings Denied October 30, 1970. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Thomas A. Wadden, Jr. (argued), Washington, D. C., James P. Cantillon, Cantillon & Cantillon, Beverly Hills, Cal., for John Roselli. Herman F. Selvin, Beverly Hills, Cal. (argued), Grant B. Cooper, Los Angeles, Cal., and Norman Oberstein, Kaplan, Livingston, Goodwin, Berkowitz & Selvin, Beverly Hills, Cal., for Maurice Friedman. Clarence S. Hunt (argued), Joseph A. Ball, Douglas Dalton, Michael F. Richman, Ball, Hunt, Hart & Brown, Long Beach, Cal., for Benjamin Teitelbaum. William Marshall Morgan (argued), Morgan, Wenzel, Lynberg, Stearns & Morris, Los Angeles, Cal., for Manuel Jacobs.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.