United States v. Bennie Ralph Timmons, Margaret Loretta Nolte, Clark Gable Timmons, and David Freddie Hileman

Good Law
432 F.2d 1011
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 197025826_1California196 words

Opinion

Opinion

432 F.2d 1011 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bennie Ralph TIMMONS, Margaret Loretta Nolte, Clark Gable Timmons, and David Freddie Hileman, Defendants-Appellants. No. 25766. No. 25809. No. 25820. No. 25826. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. November 9, 1970. Rehearing Denied December 29, 1970. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Manuel L. Real, Judge. 1 Bennie Ralph Timmons, in pro. per. 2 Peter J. Hughes (argued), Sheela, Lightner, Hughes & Castro, San Diego, Cal., for appellant Nolte. 3 William Bryan Osborne (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Timmons. 4 Michael P. Gerbosi (argued), Santa Ana, Cal., for appellant Hileman. 5 Arnold G. Regardie, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. 6 Before CHAMBERS, ELY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 7 The judgment of conviction is affirmed as to all appellants except as to Clark Gable Timmons. 8 There was improper hearsay evidence admitted. As to Clark Gable Timmons, this testimony may well have been the determining factor in the jury's mind. As to the remaining defendants, other testimony was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.