In re B.M. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On January 24, 2014, minor sexually assaulted Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2. Minor
forced Jane Doe 1 to orally copulate him in the bathroom of his house, forcing her to
swallow his ejaculate, ignoring her pleas of “‘No, don’t do it.’” He also forced Jane Doe
2 to orally copulate him in his bedroom, pushing her head down with one hand and
forcing her mouth onto his penis with the other. Other pertinent facts will be discussed as
necessary.
The Riverside County District Attorney charged minor with the following crimes:
Allegation 11—forcible oral copulation of Jane Doe 1 (Pen. Code,2 § 288a, subd.
(c)(2)(B));
The charging document characterizes each allegation as “PARAGRAPH.” For ease of reference, we will use the term “allegation.”
All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.
2 Allegation 2—aggravated sexual assault (forcible oral copulation) of Jane Doe 1,
seven or more years younger than defendant (§ 269, subd. (a)(4));
Allegation 3—forcible lewd act with a minor under the age of 14, Jane Doe
(§ 288, subd. (b)(1));
Allegation 4—forcible oral copulation of Jane Doe 2 (§ 288a, subd.…