Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.

Good Law
801 F.3d 1126·2015 WL 5315388·115 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1965·43 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2305·2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16308
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 14, 201513-16106, 13-16107California7,678 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tallman, J.

Stephanie Lenz filed suit under 17 U.S.C. § 512 (f) — part of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) — against Universal Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing, Inc., and Universal Music Publishing Group (collectively “Universal”). She alleges Universal misrepresented in a takedown notification that her 29-second home video (the “video”) constituted an infringing use of a portion of a composition by the Artist known as Prince, which Universal insists was unauthorized by the law. Her claim boils down to a question of whether copyright holders have been abusing the extrajudicial takedown procedures provided for in the DMCA by declining to first evaluate whether the content qualifies as' fair use. We hold that the statute requires copyright holders to consider fair use before sending a takedown notification, and that failure to do so raises a triable issue as to whether the copyright holder formed a subjective good faith belief that the use was not authorized by law. We affirm the denial of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.

I

Founded in May 2005, YouTube (now owned by Google) operates a website that hosts user-generated content. About YouTube,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.