Hsu

Hsu v. Prime Healthcare Services III CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 2015E060953California2,532 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/14/15 Hsu v. Prime Healthcare Services III CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

FRANK J.Y. HSU,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E060953

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS1307631)

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES III, OPINION LLC et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Thomas S. Garza,

Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Herbert Hafif, Greg K. Hafif, and Michael G. Dawson for

Defendants and Appellants.

Doll Amir & Eley, Michael M. Amir, Mary Tesh Glarum, Lloyd Vu, and Carly

Steinbaum for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant Prime Healthcare Services III, LLC (Prime) allegedly owns and

operates two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.