Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. The Procter & Gamble Company

Good Law
434 F.2d 794·167 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 713·1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6513
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 197025280California4,850 words

Opinion

Opinion

434 F.2d 794 167 U.S.P.Q. 713 CARTER-WALLACE, INC., a corporation, Appellant, v. The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, The Procter & Gamble Distributing Company, the Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, A.B.C. Market Corp., and Oliver Drug Company, corporations, Appellees. No. 25280. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 10, 1970. 1 Warren L. Kern, Richard A. Wallen, of Harris, Kiech, Russell & Kern, Los Angeles, Cal., Louis Kunin, and V. T. Giordano, of Von Maltitz, Derenberg, Kunin & Janssen, New York City, for appellant. 2 Richard E. Sherwood, Ralph W. Dau of O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., Thomas S. Calder and John E. McDowell, of Dinsmore, Shohl, Coates & Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees. 3 Before HAMLEY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and LEVIN, * District judge. 4 GERALD S. LEVIN, District Judge. 5 This is an action for unfair competition and common law trademark infringement arising from defendant's 1 alleged infringement of plaintiff's 2 personal deodorant slogan, 'Use ARRID * * * To Be Sure' and its variant, 'To Be Sure,' used in connection with plaintiff's advertising of its personal deodorant under the trademark ARRID. 6…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.