United States National Bank v. Hill

Good Law
434 F.2d 1019·1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6555
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 9, 197026447_1California747 words

Opinion

Opinion

434 F.2d 1019 UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association, Petitioner, v. Honorable Irving HILL, United States District Judge, Respondent, Sam GREITZER and Tillie Greitzer, husband and wife, Real Parties In Interest. No. 26447. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. November 9, 1970. Stephen D. Drushall, of Epport & Delevie, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Honorable Irving Hill, District Judge, in pro. per. Marshall B. Grossman of Schwartz & Alschuler, Los Angeles, Cal., for real party in interest. Theodore E. Orliss of Jaffe & Orliss, Los Angeles, Cal., Robert E. Jenks, Jr., of Calfas & Calfas, Santa Monica, Cal., for co-defendants. Before HAMLEY, ELY, and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The Petitioner is a national bank with its principal office and place of business in San Diego, California. The City of San Diego is located in the Southern District of California. The Petitioner and others were sued in the Central District of California, the claim against them being predicated, in part, upon the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (15 U.S.C. § 77v), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S. C. § 78aa).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.