Marcus A. Arnheiter v. John H. Chafee, U.S. Secretary of the Navy, Does One Through Ten, Inclusive

Good Law
435 F.2d 691·1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6273
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 197023825California237 words

Opinion

Opinion

Appellant, a lieutenant commander of the United States Navy, brought action against the Secretary of the Navy for a declaratory judgment and for relief in the nature of mandamus.

Three months after being given command of a destroyer escort ship, assigned to duty in waters off Vietnam, appellant was relieved of command on March 31, 1966. A hearing was held, with appellant present and represented by counsel. The record was forwarded to the Chief of Naval Personnel who sustained the action, as did the Secretary of the Navy. This action was brought in December 1967, seeking to have the district court direct the Secretary of the Navy to convene a court of inquiry “or other appropriate hearing pursuant to U. S. Naval Regulations” to investigate the circumstances surrounding his relief from command. Appellant remains in active Navy service.

After reviewing the voluminous record, the district court concluded that the Navy’s actions were internal, administrative matters involving the judgment of Naval Command concerning duty assignment and promotion under Vietnam War conditions, that the Navy acted in substantial conformance with regulations and well within the bounds of fundamental due…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.