People v. Espinoza CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 2015H039787California19,673 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Pedro Espinoza appeals after a jury found him guilty of forcible sodomy in concert (count 1; former Pen. Code, § 286, subd. (d)),1 forcible oral copulation in concert (count 2; former § 288a, subd. (d)), aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of 14 and more than 10 years younger than defendant (count 3; former § 269), and forcible lewd acts on a child under the age of 14 (count 4; former § 288, subd. (b)(1)). Counts 1 and 2 pertained to victim A. Doe; counts 3 and 4 pertained to victim R. Doe.2 As to counts 1 and 2, the jury found true allegations that defendant kidnapped A. Doe. (Former § 667.61, subds. (b) & (e)(1).) The trial court sentenced

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated. 2 Both victims have been identified by the last name Doe for confidentiality purposes, but the victims are not related. defendant to an indeterminate term of 30 years to life, consecutive to an eight-year determinate term. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred by: (1) denying defendant’s motion to sever the counts related to A. Doe and R. Doe; (2) excluding evidence that A. Doe had a reputation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.