People v. Corado CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 2015B252970California5,206 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Filed 9/15/15 P. v. Corado CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B252970 (Super. Ct. No. BA394921) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County)

v.

ARMANDO FLORES CORADO et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

In Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess), our Supreme Court held that a defendant is entitled to discover the personnel records of misconduct of officers when there is a factual dispute about what transpired, coupled with a plausible scenario that exculpates the accused. Here appellants sought records of officers' dishonest misconduct, including the fabrication of evidence. As we shall explain, their Pitchess…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.