United States of America, and v. Harold Wayne Lindsey
436 F.2d 1385·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11928
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 197125941_1California109 words
Opinion
The judgment of conviction is affirmed in this bank robbery case.
A Miranda point is made (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 ). The facts here fall within our United States v. Hilliker, 9 Cir., 436 F.2d 101 , decided December 11, 1970.
We find the assertion of inadequate representation to be without substance. It appears to have been quite competent, and the objections now are those of second guessing.
The length of the sentence is attacked and it is asserted there was obvious prejudice of the court. We cannot accept the validity of the assertion and we cannot review sentence.