Ernest E. Pestana, Inc. v. Aloha Sanitary District

Good Law
437 F.2d 1357
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 197126092_1California230 words

Opinion

Opinion

437 F.2d 1357 ERNEST E. PESTANA, INC. and Joe D. Miller, a Joint Venture of San Jose, California, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. ALOHA SANITARY DISTRICT and Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County, Oregon, Appellants. No. 26092. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 17, 1971. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Alfred T. Goodwin, Judge. Carrell F. Bradley (argued), of Schwenn, Bradley & Barchelor, Hillsboro, Or., for appellant. Daniel J. Seifer (argued), of Norman B. Kobin, of Kobin & Meyer, Robert C. Wall, of Reiter, Day, Wall & Bricker, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, MADDEN, Judge of the United States Court of Claims, and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Pestana, Inc., is a citizen of California and Aloha and Unified are citizens of Oregon. On this interlocutory appeal ( 28 U.S.C. § 1292 ) the sole issue involves the citizenship of plaintiff-appellee Joe D. Miller. Pestana and Miller assert a claim as joint venturers against Aloha and Unified. 2 In the district court Miller contended, as he must to sustain jurisdiction, that he was a citizen of California, and Aloha and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.