United States v. Charles Dewitt Marts, United States of America v. Francis Elaine Nickel, United States of America v. Robert Scales, United States of America v. Joseph Kirksey

Good Law
437 F.2d 1358
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 197126312-26315California235 words

Opinion

Opinion

437 F.2d 1358 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles DeWitt MARTS, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francis Elaine NICKEL, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert SCALES, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph KIRKSEY, Appellant. Nos. 26312-26315. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 5, 1971. A. Kendall Wood, of Hinchy, Katz, Witte, Wood & Anderson, San Diego, Cal., for appellant Marts. Grant Conard, of Rowe, McEwen & Conard, San Diego, Cal., for appellant Nickel. Dion Morrow (argued), of Hall & Morrow, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Scales and Kirksey. Philip Johnson, Asst. U.S. Atty., (argued), Harry D. Steward, U.S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger Chief, Crim. Div., San Diego, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and FREY, District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 The judgments of conviction are affirmed. 2 One point on appeal is that certain products of an unreasonable search were exhibited to the jury and alluded to in the oral testimony of witnesses. Chimel v. United States, 395 U.S. 752 , 89 S.Ct. 2034 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 , was handed down…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.