Harold Lewis Peek, Jr. v. United States of America

Good Law
438 F.2d 534
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 197125044California67 words

Opinion

The district court dismissed petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the ground that the contentions it raised had been determined adversely to petitioner on his prior motions. See Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); Gomez v. United States, 396 F.2d 323 (9th Cir. 1968). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the district court erred.

Affirmed.