People v. Hinds CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 2015C077458California1,243 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/16/15 P. v. Hinds CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C077458

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 12F8736 & 13F7897) v.

JOSHUA LYNN HINDS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Joshua Lynn Hinds has asked this court to review the record to determine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment and remand for correction of the abstract of judgment.

1 I We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.