United States v. Carl Ernest Johnson, Jr.

Good Law
439 F.2d 700·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11734
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 197126247California78 words

Opinion

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Johnson refused induction into the military service at a reception center. There for the first time he began to assert he was a conscientious objector and to plead that he was about to become a father.

After the refusal, he did file his claims with the local board. That was too late. See Blades v. United States, 9 Cir., 407 F.2d 1397 .

Also, there was a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.