Donald J. Schnepp v. Carl G. Hocker, Warden
439 F.2d 712·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11735
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 197126471_1California105 words
Opinion
Schnepp, a Nevada prisoner, has been here before on habeas corpus on an appeal from the District of Nevada. Schnepp v. Hocker, 429 F.2d 1096 . See also Schnepp v. State, 82 Nev. 257 , 415 P.2d 619 ; Schnepp v. Fogliam, 83 Nev. 131 , 425 P.2d 141 ; and Schnepp v. State, 84 Nev. 120 , 437 P.2d 84 .
This time he asserts there is an unconstitutional presumption against him in Nevada Revised Statutes § 205.065. The short and complete answer is the Nevada trial court did not use the presumption in its instructions.
The district court order appealed from is affirmed.