Gilbert Valdez v. People of the State of California

Good Law
439 F.2d 1405·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11274
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 197126032California337 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert Valdez (petitioner) appeals from the District Court’s summary denial of his habeas corpus petition. We reverse.

Petitioner was convicted in the Los Angeles Superior Court of first degree robbery and kidnapping with the purpose of robbery. He appealed his convictions to the California District Court of Appeal, which first reversed, People v. Valdez, 65 Cal.Rptr. 356 (2d District 1968), but on rehearing affirmed the convictions in an unreported opinion.

Petitioner then filed his pro se habeas corpus petition in forma pauperis in the United States District Court. He alleges that the search of his apartment was illegal because there was no probable cause for his arrest and because the police entered his apartment unannounced and without his consent. He further alleges that the police had no authority to search and seize articles from the garage adjacent to the apartment house over his objection. If valid, petitioner’s contentions would require exclusion of much of the evidence introduced at his state trial. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961).

The District Court denied the petition without an evidentiary hearing and without a transcript of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.