Sacramento Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Inc. v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters And Helpers Local No. 150, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Of America, Et Al.

Good Law
440 F.2d 1096
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 197123569_1California1,917 words

Opinion

Opinion

440 F.2d 1096 SACRAMENTO COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. Inc. and Fortuna Beverage Co. Inc., dba C-C Concession Co., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS AND HELPERS LOCAL NO. 150, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants-appellees. No. 23569. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 26, 1971. 1 Morton B. Jackson, Los Angeles, Cal. (argued), of Hodge, Jackson, Kumler & Croskey, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. 2 Robert Le Prohn, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), of Le Prohn & Le Prohn, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. 3 Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges and CONTI, District Judge. * 4 CONTI, District Judge. 5 The plaintiffs in this action are the Sacramento Coca-Cola Bottling Co., a bottler and seller of soft drinks, and Fortuna Beverage Co. Inc. ("C-C"), a concessionaire and vendor of soft drinks. The principal defendants are the local, national and international organizations of the Teamsters Union. 6 The allegations are basically that due to threats, duress and other coercive measures exercised by the defendants upon the California State Fair officials,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.