San Diegans etc. v. Har Construction
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 8/31/15; pub. order 9/17/15 (see end of opn.)
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SAN DIEGANS FOR OPEN D066514
GOVERNMENT,
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00091137- v. CU-MC-CTL)
HAR CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Eddie C.
Sturgeon, Judge. Affirmed.
Finch, Thornton & Baird, Louis J. Blum and Daniel P. Scholz for Defendant and
Appellant.
Briggs Law Corporation, Cory J. Briggs, Anthony N. Kim, Mekaela M. Gladden
and Isabel E. O'Donnell for Plaintiff and Respondent. Government Code section 1090 prohibits public officers from having a financial
interest in any contract "made by them" in their official capacity.1 If a public official
violates section 1090, the public entity is entitled to recover compensation paid under the
contract without restoring any of the benefits received by the contracting party. A
taxpayer has standing under certain circumstances to bring a section 1090 action to
recover this money on behalf of a public entity.