Pinnock

Pinnock v. Gotti CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2015D065575California4,128 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

Filed 9/18/15 Pinnock v. Gotti CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THEODORE A. PINNOCK, D065575

Cross-complainant and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-00104874-

CU-FR-CTL)

NONI GOTTI et al.,

Cross-defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald S.

Prager, Judge. Affirmed.

Theodore Arthur Pinnock, in pro. per., for Cross-complainant and Appellant.

David Warren Peters, in pro. per., and for Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Cross-complainant Theodore A. Pinnock, a now-disbarred attorney residing in the

Philippines, filed over 200 cases on behalf of cross-defendant Noni Gotti against

businesses for alleged violations of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.