United States v. Rich Company

Good Law
441 F.2d 1143
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 197123753California444 words

Opinion

Opinion

441 F.2d 1143 UNITED STATES of America For the Use of ACME GRANITE & TILE COMPANY, a Division of Piper & Greenhalgh, Incorporated, a Washington corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. F. D. RICH COMPANY, Incorporated, a corporation, doing business in the Stateof Washington; B & G Constructors, Incorporated, Appellees and Cross-Appellants, American Surety Company, Appellee, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company,Appellant andCross-Appellee, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Appellee andCross-Appellant. Nos. 23744, 23745, 23752 and 23753. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 8, 1971. Before HAMLEY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and GOODWIN, District judge. 1 Opinion on Petition for Rehearing PER CURIAM: 1 In a petition for rehearing, F. D. Rich Company, Incorporated, urges that this court has erred in the application of state law. 2 As noted in our original opinion, 437 F.2d 549 (9th Cir. 1970), Washington law provided when the case was tried in the District Court that the dissolution of a corporation abated any action in which the dissolved corporation was a plaintiff. Washington law with reference to the rights of creditors and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.