People v. White CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2015C076189California4,900 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/21/15 P. v. White CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE, C076189

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF-11-1121)

v.

ANDREW LAWRENCE WHITE,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Andrew Lawrence White appeals from a robbery conviction. He contends (1) the trial court prejudicially erred by admitting evidence of uncharged robberies; (2) there is insufficient evidence of identity to support the conviction; (3) the trial court prejudicially erred by permitting a police officer to provide lay opinion testimony; (4) even if none of these errors individually was prejudicial, their cumulative effect was; and (5) he is entitled to additional presentence custody credit. Because we find only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.