Ernest E. Moseley v. Walter J. Hickel, Secretary of the Department of Interior, Minerals Trust Corporation v. Walter J. Hickel, Secretary of the Department of Interior, Jesse W. Crawford v. Walter J. Hickel, Secretary of the Department of Interior

Good Law
442 F.2d 1030·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10309
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 197124707California470 words

Opinion

Opinion

442 F.2d 1030 Ernest E. MOSELEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Walter J. HICKEL, Secretary of the Department of Interior, Defendant-Appellee. MINERALS TRUST CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Walter J. HICKEL, Secretary of the Department of Interior, Defendant-Appellee. Jesse W. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Walter J. HICKEL, Secretary of the Department of Interior, Defendant-Appellee. No. 24696. No. 24706. No. 24707. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 10, 1971. Hale C. Tognoni (argued), of Tognoni & Pugh, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellants. George R. Hyde (argued), Atty., Dept. of Justice, Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Richard Alleman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Shiro Kashiwa, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee. Before MERRILL, BROWNING and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 After exhausting their administrative remedies, appellants sought review by the district court of a ruling that their mining claims and millsite claim were invalid. The district court denied their motions for summary judgment and granted the government's motion for summary judgment as to each action. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U. S.C. § 1291. We affirm. 2 Appellant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.