Jovencia Arce Vitales v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
443 F.2d 343·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9945
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 197126686_1California1,010 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vitales was admitted to this country from the Philippines on July 21, 1968 under a non-immigrant visitors’ visa. On May 18, 1969, she gave birth to a child in the United States. She overstayed the permitted time and was charged with being deportable under § 241(a) (2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a) (2). At a hearing before a Special Inquiry Officer she admitted the charge but sought to show that, under § 241(f) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (f), she was not deportable because she had procured her non-immigrant visa by fraud and was otherwise admissible to this country. Her counsel offered to show that when she obtained the visa she intended to stay in this country permanently, that she failed to disclose her education to the Consul, failed to disclose relatives, and used a false statement of funds in bank. Most of the proof was rejected, the officer ruling that § 241(f) did not apply. The question whether she was otherwise admissible was not reached. An order of deportation was issued and affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals.

We hold that the decision of the Supreme Court in I.N.S. v. Errico, 1966, 385 U.S. 214 , 87 S.Ct. 473 , 17 L.Ed.2d 318 ,…

Concurring Opinion

Gray, J.

(concurring):

It seems to me that if a person accepted admission as a visitor, she cannot later be heard to make a self-serving claim of her own fraud by denying that she entered as a visitor. However, Lee Fook Chuey does indicate to the contrary, and I therefore feel obliged to concur in the remand.

Opinion

443 F.2d 343 Jovencia Arce VITALES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 26686. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 28, 1971. Robert S. Bixby (argued), of Fallon, Hargreaves & Bixby, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Charles Gordon (argued), Gen. Counsel, I.N.S., Washington, D.C., James L. Browning, Jr., U.S. Atty., Stephen Suffin, Atty., I.N.S., San Francisco, Cal., John N. Mitchell, U.S. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BARNES, DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and GRAY, 1 District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Vitales was admitted to this country from the Philippines on July 21, 1968 under a non-immigrant visitors' visa. On May 18, 1969, she gave birth to a child in the United States. She overstayed the permitted time and was charged with being deportable under 241(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(2). At a hearing before a Special Inquiry Officer she admitted the charge but sought to show that, under 241(f) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1251(f), she was not deportable because she had procured her non-immigrant visa by fraud and was otherwise admissible to this country. Her counsel offered to show…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.