Robert W. Sjosten, and v. Merle Scheckloth, Etc.

Good Law
443 F.2d 1181·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9114
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 197125325California52 words

Opinion

The order denying habeas corpus relief is affirmed.

First, we find that Sjosten has never presented or attempted to present the point to a California state court which he makes in federal court.

Further, on the facts here, the error does not rise to constitutional dimensions. The evidence of guilt was overwhelming.