Robert W. Sjosten, and v. Merle Scheckloth, Etc.
443 F.2d 1181·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9114
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 197125325California52 words
Opinion
The order denying habeas corpus relief is affirmed.
First, we find that Sjosten has never presented or attempted to present the point to a California state court which he makes in federal court.
Further, on the facts here, the error does not rise to constitutional dimensions. The evidence of guilt was overwhelming.