Rojas

Rojas v. United Parcel Service CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 2015D068070California3,433 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/22/15 Rojas v. United Parcel Service CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND JOHN JOSEPH ROJAS, D068070

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVRS1203243)

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County,

Joseph R. Brisco, Judge. Affirmed.

Lavi & Ebrahimian, N. Nick Ebrahimian, Joseph Lavi and Jordan D. Bello for

Plaintiff and Appellant.

Paul Hastings, George W. Abele and Ji Hae Kim for Defendants and Respondents

United Parcel Service, Inc. and Nicholas Barron.

Raymond Rojas appeals a grant of summary judgment in his defamation action

against defendants United Parcel Service (UPS) and Nicholas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.