United States of America, and v. Mitchell Darryl Snyder

Good Law
444 F.2d 1096
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 6, 197126917California44 words

Opinion

In this Dyer Act case, we find sufficient evidence of joint venture in the possessing and transporting of the automobile to uphold Snyder’s conviction.

Judge Hufstedler dissents upon the ground that the evidence is patently inadequate to support the implied finding of joint venture.