National Labor Relations Board v. Victor Otlans Roofing Co.

Good Law
445 F.2d 299·77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2893·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9368
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 197126196California343 words

Opinion

Opinion

Larrell Lane, employed as a kettleman by the respondent, Victor Otlans Roofing Co., was discharged. He claimed that the true cause of the discharge was union activity. A charge was filed against the employer before the National Labor Relations Board by Lane’s union to this effect and eventually a hearing held before a Trial Examiner on the issues joined by the Employer’s denial.

The Trial Examiner found in favor of the union and the employee and entered an order for reinstatement and back pay. A review by the Board resulted in an order affirming the Trial Examiner’s findings and order subject to a change in a date which was of no substantial significance.

The case is now before this court upon an application of the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to Section 10(e) of the Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. Section 151 et seq. for enforcement of its order against Otlans

Otlans was found by the Board to have violated Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Board by discharging Lane because of his union activity and refusing to reinstate him. A violation of Section 8(a) (3) and (1) may be found where an employee is discharged because he has sought with the aid of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.