National Labor Relations Board v. Sir James, Inc.
446 F.2d 570·77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3159·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8641
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 6, 197126881_1California62 words
Opinion
The Board’s order will be enforced.
The early unilateral discontinuance of the health and welfare payments we conclude was an unfair labor practice. Hin-son v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 428 F.2d 133 .
The finding that the company refused to bargain to an impasse is supported by the record considered as a whole.
THOMPSON, District Judge, dissents on the refusal to bargain issue.