In the Matter of Leslie Bacon, a Witness Before the Grand Jury v. United States

Good Law
446 F.2d 667·1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9335
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 197171-1825_1California808 words

Opinion

Opinion

Leslie Bacon appeals from a civil contempt order of confinement entered on May 19, 1971, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1826 . The order is based upon a finding that appellant had refused to obey the court’s prior order of the same day, issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 6002 and 6003, granting her immunity and ordering her to answer the questions asked by the grand jury which she had previously refused to answer. On June 15,1971, we entered orders releasing appellant from custody subject to specified conditions, pending disposition of this appeal, and expediting the appeal.

Appellant argues that the “use immunity” provided by section 6002 does not provide her protection commensurate with the Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and that only if she were provided a “transaction immunity” would she be under compulsion to testify before the grand jury.

We must reject this argument in view of recent decisions of this court holding to the contrary on this precise question. See Charleston v. United States (Herlicy v. United States) 444 F.2d 504 (9th Cir. 1971), and Stewart v. United States (Kastigar v. United States), 440 F.2d 954 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. granted May 17, 1971, 402…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.