Goldberg

Goldberg v. Humphries CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 2015B260378California2,315 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/22/15 Goldberg v. Humphries CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

KAYLA GOLDBERG B260378

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC491232) v.

KRIS HUMPHRIES,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles Country, Gregory Keosian, Judge. Affirmed. Hennig Ruiz, Rob Hennig and Brandon Ruiz for Plaintiff and Appellant. Zelle Hofmann Voelbel & Mason, Lee A. Hutton, III and Eric W. Buetzow for Defendant and Respondent.

______________________________ The plaintiff in this tort liability case, Kayla Goldberg, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Kris Humphries. We conclude Goldberg has not raised a triable issue of material…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.